martes, 19 de junio de 2012

Evaluation of polymerase chain ... [J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Evaluation of polymerase chain ... [J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Jun 1. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04593.x. [Epub ahead of print]

Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction assays for the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in Russia.

Source

Laboratory of Microbiology, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Petersburg, Russia Laboratory Reference and Research Branch, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, USA Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other STIs, National Reference Laboratory for Pathogenic Neisseria, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.

Abstract

Background   In Russia, the microscopy- and culture-based diagnostics of trichomoniasis is mainly suboptimal. Recent years, domestically produced diagnostic PCR assays have been implemented; however, any evaluation of these PCRs has never been internationally reported. Objective  To assess the performance characteristics of PCR assays developed and currently used in Russia to detect Trichomonas vaginalis. Materials and methods  Five PCR assays were assessed on 448 samples (317 vaginal and 131 male urethral) collected from symptomatic attendees of youth centres (n = 415) and patients of a dermatovenereological dispensary that were previously diagnosed with trichomoniasis (n = 33). As reference assay, a sensitive and specific real-time multiplex PCR was used. Results  T. vaginalis DNA was detected in five (all females) of the 415 patients of youth centres (1.2%). All 33 patients previously diagnosed at the venereological dispensary proved to be true positive. For 445 (99.3%) of these 448 samples identical results were obtained by all PCRs, 35 positive and 410 negative. The three discordant samples were positive in all PCRs except one conventional PCR assay. The sensitivities of the PCRs were 94.3-100% and 66.7-100% for vaginal and urethral swabs, respectively. All evaluated assays were 100% specific. The detection limits of the different PCRs ranged from 0.1 to 5 genome equivalents per reaction. Conclusion  The PCR assays currently used in Russia for the detection of T. vaginalis have in general high sensitivities and excellent specificities for both vaginal samples and urethral samples from males.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology © 2012 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
PMID:
22672184
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario